↓ Skip to main content

Religiosity and the Transition to Nonmarital Parity

Overview of attention for article published in Sexuality Research and Social Policy, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Religiosity and the Transition to Nonmarital Parity
Published in
Sexuality Research and Social Policy, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13178-014-0153-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heidi Ann Lyons, Scott James Smith

Abstract

Nonmarital parity is associated with several negative outcomes, including health problems, educational problems, and poverty. Understanding the risk and protective factors associated with nonmarital parenthood can inform policy and interventions, reducing both the incidences and associated consequences. The current study focuses on how intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity (the degree to which individuals or groups employ religious ideology in forming values and making decisions) are related to the timing of nonmarital parity using discrete time hazard modeling of a nationally representative sample of adolescent females (N=7,367) from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. The majority of the sample (86 %) claimed a religious affiliation and almost a third (32 %) had a nonmarital birth during the study. Even though the majority of the sample is White (67 %), Black and Hispanic females were more likely to experience a nonmarital birth. Results indicate that intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity and religious affiliation assert protective effects for some populations while religious affiliation increases risk in the full model. Recommendations for policy, intervention, and future research are offered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 21%
Social Sciences 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 19 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2014.
All research outputs
#21,498,958
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Sexuality Research and Social Policy
#529
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,323
of 228,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sexuality Research and Social Policy
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.