↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and pathologic features of familial pancreatic cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer (0008543X), October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical and pathologic features of familial pancreatic cancer
Published in
Cancer (0008543X), October 2014
DOI 10.1002/cncr.28863
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy L. Humphris, Amber L. Johns, Skye H. Simpson, Mark J. Cowley, Marina Pajic, David K. Chang, Adnan M. Nagrial, Venessa T. Chin, Lorraine A. Chantrill, Mark Pinese, R. Scott Mead, Anthony J. Gill, Jaswinder S. Samra, James G. Kench, Elizabeth A. Musgrove, Katherine M. Tucker, Allan D. Spigelman, Nic Waddell, Sean M. Grimmond, Andrew V. Biankin, the Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative

Abstract

Inherited predisposition to pancreatic cancer contributes significantly to its incidence and presents an opportunity for the development of early detection strategies. The genetic basis of predisposition remains unexplained in a high proportion of patients with familial PC (FPC).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 20 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Psychology 3 4%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 24 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2014.
All research outputs
#406,557
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Cancer (0008543X)
#390
of 14,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,050
of 268,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer (0008543X)
#4
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.