You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical and pathologic features of familial pancreatic cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer (0008543X), October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/cncr.28863 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jeremy L. Humphris, Amber L. Johns, Skye H. Simpson, Mark J. Cowley, Marina Pajic, David K. Chang, Adnan M. Nagrial, Venessa T. Chin, Lorraine A. Chantrill, Mark Pinese, R. Scott Mead, Anthony J. Gill, Jaswinder S. Samra, James G. Kench, Elizabeth A. Musgrove, Katherine M. Tucker, Allan D. Spigelman, Nic Waddell, Sean M. Grimmond, Andrew V. Biankin, the Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative |
Abstract |
Inherited predisposition to pancreatic cancer contributes significantly to its incidence and presents an opportunity for the development of early detection strategies. The genetic basis of predisposition remains unexplained in a high proportion of patients with familial PC (FPC). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 46% |
Australia | 6 | 25% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Colombia | 1 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 46% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 29% |
Scientists | 5 | 21% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 71 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 22% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 17% |
Unknown | 20 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 35% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
Psychology | 3 | 4% |
Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 24 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2014.
All research outputs
#406,557
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Cancer (0008543X)
#390
of 14,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,050
of 268,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer (0008543X)
#4
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.