| Title |
Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Educational technology research and development, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1 |
| Authors |
Sanna Järvelä, Paul A. Kirschner, Ernesto Panadero, Jonna Malmberg, Chris Phielix, Jos Jaspers, Marika Koivuniemi, Hanna Järvenoja |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 10% |
| Ireland | 1 | 10% |
| Finland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 504 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 490 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 92 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 78 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 63 | 13% |
| Researcher | 45 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 86 | 17% |
| Unknown | 117 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 133 | 26% |
| Psychology | 63 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 59 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 24 | 5% |
| Design | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 63 | 13% |
| Unknown | 148 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,702,366
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Educational technology research and development
#103
of 1,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,435
of 273,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational technology research and development
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.