You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Precision and Reliability of 5 Platelet Function Tests in Healthy Volunteers and Donors on Daily Antiplatelet Agent Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Chemistry, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1373/clinchem.2014.226332 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brad S Karon, Nicole V Tolan, Christopher D Koch, Amy M Wockenfus, Randall S Miller, Ravi K Lingineni, Rajiv K Pruthi, Dong Chen, Allan S Jaffe |
| Abstract |
Anticoagulation protocols used during mechanical circulatory support call for titration of antiplatelet agents. We compared the precision and reliability of 5 platelet function tests in healthy volunteers and donors on daily antiplatelet therapy to distinguish their efficacy for titrating antiplatelet therapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 20% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 24% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 56% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2014.
All research outputs
#13,414,292
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Chemistry
#6,122
of 7,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,075
of 361,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Chemistry
#36
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.