↓ Skip to main content

Numerical simulation of basaltic lava flows in the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand—implication for volcanic hazard assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Volcanology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Numerical simulation of basaltic lava flows in the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand—implication for volcanic hazard assessment
Published in
Bulletin of Volcanology, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00445-014-0879-6
Authors

Gábor Kereszturi, Annalisa Cappello, Gaetana Ganci, Jonathan Procter, Károly Németh, Ciro Del Negro, Shane J. Cronin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iceland 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 62%
Engineering 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2014.
All research outputs
#18,812,604
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#925
of 1,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,256
of 257,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.