You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-Wide Population-Based Association Study of Extremely Overweight Young Adults – The GOYA Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0024303 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lavinia Paternoster, David M. Evans, Ellen Aagaard Nohr, Claus Holst, Valerie Gaborieau, Paul Brennan, Anette Prior Gjesing, Niels Grarup, Daniel R. Witte, Torben Jørgensen, Allan Linneberg, Torsten Lauritzen, Anelli Sandbaek, Torben Hansen, Oluf Pedersen, Katherine S. Elliott, John P. Kemp, Beate St. Pourcain, George McMahon, Diana Zelenika, Jörg Hager, Mark Lathrop, Nicholas J. Timpson, George Davey Smith, Thorkild I. A. Sørensen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Algeria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 25% |
| Researcher | 23 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2011.
All research outputs
#20,567,353
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#179,195
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,850
of 141,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,033
of 2,550 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,550 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.