| Title |
Agreement between accelerometer-assessed and self-reported physical activity and sedentary time in colon cancer survivors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-014-2453-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Terry Boyle, Brigid M. Lynch, Kerry S. Courneya, Jeff K. Vallance |
| Abstract |
Research conducted on the general population indicates self-reported measures of physical activity and sedentary behaviour are inaccurate when compared with objective measures; however, it is not clear if this also applies to cancer survivors. In this study, we compared accelerometer-based and self-reported measures of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time among colon cancer survivors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 23% |
| Sports and Recreations | 16 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Psychology | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,377,027
of 23,327,904 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,524
of 4,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,797
of 257,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#21
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,327,904 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.