↓ Skip to main content

Propagating and Aggregating Fuzzy Polarities for Concept-Level Sentiment Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Computation, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Propagating and Aggregating Fuzzy Polarities for Concept-Level Sentiment Analysis
Published in
Cognitive Computation, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12559-014-9308-6
Authors

Mauro Dragoni, Andrea G. B. Tettamanzi, Célia da Costa Pereira

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
India 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Master 7 14%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 18 37%
Decision Sciences 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Mathematics 2 4%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2014.
All research outputs
#18,380,628
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Computation
#219
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,627
of 255,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Computation
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.