↓ Skip to main content

Painless Acute Aortic Dissection

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Painless Acute Aortic Dissection
Published in
Circulation Journal, November 2010
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0183
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroshi Imamura, Yukio Sekiguchi, Tomomi Iwashita, Hiroshi Dohgomori, Katsunori Mochizuki, Kazunori Aizawa, Shin-ichi Aso, Yuichi Kamiyoshi, Uichi Ikeda, Jun Amano, Kazufumi Okamoto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Greece 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 48 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 7 13%
Other 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 14 27%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,608,934
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#149
of 2,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,975
of 101,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.