| Title |
History lessons: the Asian Flu pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp09x453882 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire Jackson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 201 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 74 | 37% |
| United States | 14 | 7% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Antarctica | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 91 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 185 | 92% |
| Scientists | 10 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 46 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 7% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 26% |
| Unknown | 52 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 367. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#87,916
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#32
of 4,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180
of 123,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.