| Title |
Species’ traits influence ground beetle responses to farm and landscape level agricultural intensification in Europe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Insect Conservation, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10841-014-9690-0 |
| Authors |
Camilla Winqvist, Jan Bengtsson, Erik Öckinger, Tsipe Aavik, Frank Berendse, Lars W. Clement, Christina Fischer, Andreas Flohre, Flavia Geiger, Jaan Liira, Carsten Thies, Teja Tscharntke, Wolfgang W. Weisser, Riccardo Bommarco |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 2 | 2% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 23% |
| Researcher | 25 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,256,423
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#479
of 651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,220
of 250,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.