↓ Skip to main content

Ginger extract diminishes chronic fructose consumption-induced kidney injury through suppression of renal overexpression of proinflammatory cytokines in rats

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Ginger extract diminishes chronic fructose consumption-induced kidney injury through suppression of renal overexpression of proinflammatory cytokines in rats
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-14-174
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ming Yang, Changjin Liu, Jian Jiang, Guowei Zuo, Xuemei Lin, Johji Yamahara, Jianwei Wang, Yuhao Li

Abstract

The metabolic syndrome is associated with an increased risk of development and progression of chronic kidney disease. Renal inflammation is well known to play an important role in the initiation and progression of tubulointerstitial injury of the kidneys. Ginger, one of the most commonly used spices and medicinal plants, has been demonstrated to improve diet-induced metabolic abnormalities. However, the efficacy of ginger on the metabolic syndrome-associated kidney injury remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the impact of ginger on fructose consumption-induced adverse effects in the kidneys.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 16 27%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,777,173
of 25,547,904 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#299
of 3,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,230
of 241,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#11
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,904 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.