↓ Skip to main content

Host resistance in cattle to infestation with the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus

Overview of attention for article published in Parasite Immunology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Host resistance in cattle to infestation with the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus
Published in
Parasite Immunology, October 2014
DOI 10.1111/pim.12140
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. N. Jonsson, E. K. Piper, C. C. Constantinoiu

Abstract

Resistance to Rhipicephalus microplus infestation in cattle has many effector mechanisms, each of which is likely to be modulated by complex, interacting factors. Some of the mechanisms of host resistance and their modulating factors have been identified and quantified, although much remains to be explained. The variation in resistance to tick infestation is most marked between Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle, taurine cattle given the same exposure carrying between five and ten times as many ticks as indicine cattle. Tick resistance is mostly manifest against attaching larvae, which attempt to feed often and without success, death occurring mostly within 24 h of finding a host. There is evidence of innate and adaptive immune response to tick infestation and it appears that the relative importance of each differs between indicine and taurine cattle. There is conflicting information regarding the role of humoral immunity in tick resistance, recent studies indicating that strong IgG responses to tick antigens are not protective. A strong T-cell mediated response directed against larval stages, as mounted by indicine cattle, seems to be protective. Variation in the extracellular matrix of skin (epidermal growth factors, collagens and other matrix components such as lumican) also contributes to variation in host resistance. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 38%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2015.
All research outputs
#19,177,100
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Parasite Immunology
#658
of 920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,948
of 265,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasite Immunology
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 920 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.