↓ Skip to main content

Subjective perception versus objective outcome after intravitreal ranibizumab for exudative AMD

Overview of attention for article published in Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Subjective perception versus objective outcome after intravitreal ranibizumab for exudative AMD
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00417-011-1792-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Konrad R. Koch, Philipp S. Muether, Manuel M. Hermann, Robert Hoerster, Bernd Kirchhof, Sascha Fauser

Abstract

The efficacy of ranibizumab in preserving visual acuity in exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) has been widely demonstrated. However, statistically significant improvements in outcome measures such as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) may not necessarily be clinically relevant. Clinical relevance can be assumed when the treatment success is perceivable for the patient. We therefore investigated the relation between subjective perception of the treatment success and the objective outcome after intravitreal ranibizumab treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 6 25%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 2 8%