↓ Skip to main content

Impact of mosaic infection on growth and yield of sugarcane

Overview of attention for article published in Sugar Tech, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 106)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Impact of mosaic infection on growth and yield of sugarcane
Published in
Sugar Tech, March 2005
DOI 10.1007/bf02942419
Authors

R. Viswanathan, M. Balamuralikrishnan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Unspecified 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 41%
Unspecified 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,541,115
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Sugar Tech
#20
of 106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,950
of 60,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sugar Tech
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 106 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them