You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enhanced recovery pathways in gynecologic oncology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gynecologic Oncology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.10.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gregg Nelson, Eleftheria Kalogera, Sean C. Dowdy |
| Abstract |
Many commonplace perioperative practices are lacking in scientific evidence and may interfere with the goal of optimizing patient recovery. Individual components of perioperative care have therefore been scrutinized, resulting in the creation of so-called "enhanced recovery" pathways (ERP), with the goal of hastening surgical recovery through attenuation of the stress response. In this review we examine the evidence for ERP in gynecologic oncology using data from our specialty and general surgery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Sweden | 1 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 13% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 21% |
| Unknown | 32 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 42 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,373,276
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Gynecologic Oncology
#1,379
of 4,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,030
of 268,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gynecologic Oncology
#14
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.