↓ Skip to main content

Heat shock preconditioning protects against ER stress‐induced apoptosis through the regulation of the BH3‐only protein BIM

Overview of attention for article published in FEBS Open Bio, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heat shock preconditioning protects against ER stress‐induced apoptosis through the regulation of the BH3‐only protein BIM
Published in
FEBS Open Bio, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.fob.2014.09.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donna Kennedy, Katarzyna Mnich, Afshin Samali

Abstract

A mild heat shock (HS) preconditioning and acquisition of thermotolerance protects cells against a variety of cytotoxic agents that otherwise induce apoptosis. Here we tested whether there is a molecular link between HS preconditioning and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-induced apoptosis. ER stress results from a loss of ER lumen homeostasis, culminating in an accumulation of unfolded/misfolded proteins in the ER and activation of unfolded protein response (UPR). Unresolved, ER stress leads to activation of BH3-only proteins, mitochondrial membrane permeabilization, caspase activation and apoptotic cell death. HS preconditioning (1 h at 42 °C) induced a rapid increase in HSPA1 (HSP70) levels which remained elevated for at least 48 h post-HS. HS preconditioning significantly reduced BAX, caspase activation and apoptosis in cell cultures treated with the ER stress-inducing agents thapsigargin (TG) and tunicamycin (TM). HS-mediated protection was found to be due to regulation of the BH3-only protein BIM. Further, overexpression of HSPA1 could not mimic the effect of HS on BIM expression, suggesting that other HS factors may play a role in inhibiting ER stress-induced apoptosis by regulating BIM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 33%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 22%
Engineering 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from FEBS Open Bio
#1,092
of 1,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,938
of 259,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FEBS Open Bio
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,711 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.