↓ Skip to main content

Validity and reliability of a pilot scale for assessment of multiple system atrophy symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Cerebellum & Ataxias, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Validity and reliability of a pilot scale for assessment of multiple system atrophy symptoms
Published in
Cerebellum & Ataxias, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40673-017-0067-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masaaki Matsushima, Ichiro Yabe, Ikuko Takahashi, Makoto Hirotani, Takahiro Kano, Kazuhiro Horiuchi, Hideki Houzen, Hidenao Sasaki

Abstract

Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a rare progressive neurodegenerative disorder for which brief yet sensitive scale is required in order for use in clinical trials and general screening. We previously compared several scales for the assessment of MSA symptoms and devised an eight-item pilot scale with large standardized response mean [handwriting, finger taps, transfers, standing with feet together, turning trunk, turning 360°, gait, body sway]. The aim of the present study is to investigate the validity and reliability of a simple pilot scale for assessment of multiple system atrophy symptoms. Thirty-two patients with MSA (15 male/17 female; 20 cerebellar subtype [MSA-C]/12 parkinsonian subtype [MSA-P]) were prospectively registered between January 1, 2014 and February 28, 2015. Patients were evaluated by two independent raters using the Unified MSA Rating Scale (UMSARS), Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), and the pilot scale. Correlations between UMSARS, SARA, pilot scale scores, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Cronbach's alpha coefficients were calculated. Pilot scale scores significantly correlated with scores for UMSARS Parts I, II, and IV as well as with SARA scores. Intra-rater and inter-rater ICCs and Cronbach's alpha coefficients remained high (> 0.94) for all measures. The results of the present study indicate the validity and reliability of the eight-item pilot scale, particularly for the assessment of symptoms in patients with early state multiple system atrophy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 47%