↓ Skip to main content

Parent and Family Impact of Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Review and Proposed Model for Intervention Evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
579 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1238 Mendeley
Title
Parent and Family Impact of Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Review and Proposed Model for Intervention Evaluation
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10567-012-0119-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey S. Karst, Amy Vaughan Van Hecke

Abstract

Raising a child with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can be an overwhelming experience for parents and families. The pervasive and severe deficits often present in children with ASD are associated with a plethora of difficulties in caregivers, including decreased parenting efficacy, increased parenting stress, and an increase in mental and physical health problems compared with parents of both typically developing children and children with other developmental disorders. In addition to significant financial strain and time pressures, high rates of divorce and lower overall family well-being highlight the burden that having a child with an ASD can place on families. These parent and family effects reciprocally and negatively impact the diagnosed child and can even serve to diminish the positive effects of intervention. However, most interventions for ASD are evaluated only in terms of child outcomes, ignoring parent and family factors that may have an influence on both the immediate and long-term effects of therapy. It cannot be assumed that even significant improvements in the diagnosed child will ameliorate the parent and family distress already present, especially as the time and expense of intervention can add further family disruption. Thus, a new model of intervention evaluation is proposed, which incorporates these factors and better captures the transactional nature of these relationships.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 1219 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 238 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 140 11%
Student > Bachelor 140 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 101 8%
Researcher 97 8%
Other 210 17%
Unknown 312 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 390 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 126 10%
Social Sciences 120 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 95 8%
Arts and Humanities 21 2%
Other 139 11%
Unknown 347 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,112,372
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#91
of 412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,196
of 186,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.