You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reviews and syntheses: Field data to benchmark the carbon cycle models for tropical forests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biogeosciences, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.5194/bg-14-4663-2017 |
| Authors |
Deborah A. Clark, Shinichi Asao, Rosie Fisher, Sasha Reed, Peter B. Reich, Michael G. Ryan, Tana E. Wood, Xiaojuan Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 21% |
| United States | 3 | 21% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Professor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 43 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 13% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#4,838,109
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Biogeosciences
#1,345
of 3,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,896
of 338,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeosciences
#39
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.