| Title |
Fit for purpose – the right animal in the right place
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tropical Animal Health and Production, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11250-008-9274-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Trevor Wilson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Uganda | 1 | 3% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 20% |
| Researcher | 7 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 60% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#190
of 1,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,879
of 89,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.