↓ Skip to main content

Neighborhood Factors Affecting Rates of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Chicago

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Neighborhood Factors Affecting Rates of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Chicago
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11524-009-9410-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

James C. Thomas, Elizabeth A. Torrone, Christopher R. Browning

Abstract

High rates of gonorrhea have been shown to be associated with high rates of incarceration in the prior year. One hypothesized chain of events is that there is a negative effect of incarceration on neighborhood social characteristics, which in turn affect behaviors facilitating transmission of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). This study examined whether neighborhood characteristics were associated with the incidence of STDs and homicide rates as a proxy for incarceration rates. Data were from the 1995 Program on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods, the Chicago Health Department, and the Chicago Police Department. Neighborhood gonorrhea rates increased by 192.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 131.6, 252.9) cases per 100,000 population with a change from the 25th to the 75th percentile of social disorder. This rate difference was a value greater than the median neighborhood gonorrhea rate. Similar increases were observed for other neighborhood measures and for Chlamydia infection. We hypothesize that high rates of incarceration may play a role in undermining neighborhood social cohesion and control. Using homicide rates as a proxy for incarceration, a change from the 25th to the 75th percentile of 1995 neighborhood homicide rates yielded a gonorrhea rate increase of 164.6 (95% CI 124.4, 204.7) cases per 100,000. Factors that undermine the social fabric of a community can become manifest in health outcomes such as STDs. The effects of high rates of incarceration on neighborhoods merit further exploration.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 58 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Master 9 15%
Other 5 8%
Professor 5 8%
Other 18 29%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 23 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,239,689
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#1,242
of 1,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,196
of 165,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#13
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.