↓ Skip to main content

Periconception Weight Loss: Common Sense for Mothers, but What about for Babies?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Obesity, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Periconception Weight Loss: Common Sense for Mothers, but What about for Babies?
Published in
Journal of Obesity, April 2014
DOI 10.1155/2014/204295
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristine Matusiak, Helen L. Barrett, Leonie K. Callaway, Marloes Dekker Nitert

Abstract

Obesity in the childbearing population is increasingly common. Obesity is associated with increased risk for a number of maternal and neonatal pregnancy complications. Some of these complications, such as gestational diabetes, are risk factors for long-term disease in both mother and baby. While clinical practice guidelines advocate for healthy weight prior to pregnancy, there is not a clear directive for achieving healthy weight before conception. There are known benefits to even moderate weight loss prior to pregnancy, but there are potential adverse effects of restricted nutrition during the periconceptional period. Epidemiological and animal studies point to differences in offspring conceived during a time of maternal nutritional restriction. These include changes in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function, body composition, glucose metabolism, and cardiovascular function. The periconceptional period is therefore believed to play an important role in programming offspring physiological function and is sensitive to nutritional insult. This review summarizes the evidence to date for offspring programming as a result of maternal periconception weight loss. Further research is needed in humans to clearly identify benefits and potential risks of losing weight in the months before conceiving. This may then inform us of clinical practice guidelines for optimal approaches to achieving a healthy weight before pregnancy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 26%
Student > Bachelor 12 20%
Researcher 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Psychology 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 13 21%