↓ Skip to main content

Counselor-Level Predictors of Sustained Use of an Indicated Preventive Intervention for Aggressive Children

Overview of attention for article published in Prevention Science, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Counselor-Level Predictors of Sustained Use of an Indicated Preventive Intervention for Aggressive Children
Published in
Prevention Science, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11121-014-0511-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

John E. Lochman, Nicole P. Powell, Caroline L. Boxmeyer, Lixin Qu, Meghann Sallee, Karen C. Wells, Michael Windle

Abstract

Despite widespread concern about the frequent failure of trained prevention staff to continue to use evidence-based programs following periods of intensive training, little research has addressed the characteristics and experiences of counselors that might predict their sustained use of a program. The current study follows a sample of school counselors who were trained to use an indicated preventive intervention, the Coping Power program, in an earlier dissemination study, and determines their levels of continued use of the program's child and parent components in the 2 years following the counselors' intensive training in the program. Counselor characteristics and experiences were also examined as predictors of their sustained use of the program components. The Coping Power program addresses children's emotional regulation, social cognitive processes, and increases in positive interpersonal behaviors with at-risk children who have been screened to have moderate to high levels of aggressive behavior. The results indicated that counselors' perceptions of interpersonal support from teachers within their schools, their perceptions of the effectiveness of the program, and their expectations for using the program were all predictive of program use over the following 2 years. In addition, certain counselor personality characteristics (i.e., conscientiousness) and the level of actual teacher-rated behavior change experienced by the children they worked with during training were predictors of counselors' use of the program during the second year after training. These results indicate the central importance of teacher support and of child progress during training in the prediction of counselors' sustained use of a prevention program.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Social Sciences 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 26 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,462,585
of 24,228,883 outputs
Outputs from Prevention Science
#839
of 1,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,921
of 260,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prevention Science
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,228,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.