↓ Skip to main content

Determination of size, sex and maturity stage of free swimming catsharks using laser photogrammetry

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Determination of size, sex and maturity stage of free swimming catsharks using laser photogrammetry
Published in
Marine Biology, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00227-017-3241-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toby D. Rogers, Giulia Cambiè, Michel J. Kaiser

Abstract

The lack of detailed life history (LH) information (e.g. age, growth, size at maturity, sex composition etc.) for many species of conservation importance limits the implementation of appropriate conservation measures. Typically, LH information is acquired using lethal sampling techniques, which undermines the goal of conservation. This is particularly problematic for many shark species that have low fecundity and slow growth rates. Here we tested the use of non-invasive laser photogrammetry to measure body morphometry in vivo. We used random forest classification models to identify allometric relationships (ratios between body measurements) that discriminated between the sex and stage of sexual maturity of Scyliorhinus canicula. We coupled the use of allometric ratios (determined from cadavers) with parallel laser photogrammetry, in order to collect total length (TL) and finer scale morphometrics from 37 free-swimming individuals. TL measurements proved to be accurate (SE = 5.2%) and precise (CV = 1.8%), and did not differ significantly from the known TL of the respective animal (t36 = 0.7, P = 0.5). Conditional Inference tree model predictions of free-swimming sharks correctly predicted 100% of mature males and 79% of immature males. Our results suggest that when used together, allometric ratios and parallel laser photogrammetry have the potential to be a promising alternative to collect essential life history information from free swimming animals and avoids the need for destructive sampling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 20%
Student > Master 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Other 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 45%
Environmental Science 4 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 8%
Computer Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,850,234
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#2,647
of 3,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,677
of 341,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#26
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.