↓ Skip to main content

Endogenous tissue engineering: PTH therapy for skeletal repair

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Research, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Endogenous tissue engineering: PTH therapy for skeletal repair
Published in
Cell and Tissue Research, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00441-011-1188-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masahiko Takahata, Hani A. Awad, Regis J. O’Keefe, Susan V. Bukata, Edward M. Schwarz

Abstract

Based on its proven anabolic effects on bone in osteoporosis patients, recombinant parathyroid hormone (PTH(1-34)) has been evaluated as a potential therapy for skeletal repair. In animals, the effect of PTH(1-34) has been investigated in various skeletal repair models such as fractures, allografting, spinal arthrodesis and distraction osteogenesis. These studies have demonstrated that intermittent PTH(1-34) treatment enhances and accelerates the skeletal repair process via a number of mechanisms, which include effects on mesenchymal stem cells, angiogenesis, chondrogenesis, bone formation and resorption. Furthermore, PTH(1-34) has been shown to enhance bone repair in challenged animal models of aging, inflammatory arthritis and glucocorticoid-induced bone loss. This pre-clinical success has led to off-label clinical use and a number of case reports documenting PTH(1-34) treatment of delayed-unions and non-unions have been published. Although a recently completed phase 2 clinical trial of PTH(1-34) treatment of patients with radius fracture has failed to achieve its primary outcome, largely because of effective healing in the placebo group, several secondary outcomes are statistically significant, highlighting important issues concerning the appropriate patient population for PTH(1-34) therapy in skeletal repair. Here, we review our current knowledge of the effects of PTH(1-34) therapy for bone healing, enumerate several critical unresolved issues (e.g., appropriate dosing regimen and indications) and discuss the long-term potential of this drug as an adjuvant for endogenous tissue engineering.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 76 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Professor 5 6%
Other 20 26%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 14%
Engineering 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2014.
All research outputs
#16,061,913
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#1,468
of 2,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,604
of 113,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.