| Title |
An investigation of middle school science teachers and students use of technology inside and outside of classrooms: considering whether digital natives are more technology savvy than their teachers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Educational technology research and development, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11423-014-9355-4 |
| Authors |
Shiang-Kwei Wang, Hui-Yin Hsu, Todd Campbell, Daniel C. Coster, Max Longhurst |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 30% |
| Australia | 2 | 9% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 87% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 588 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 574 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 263 | 45% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 52 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 6% |
| Researcher | 27 | 5% |
| Other | 84 | 14% |
| Unknown | 73 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 170 | 29% |
| Arts and Humanities | 92 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 80 | 14% |
| Mathematics | 37 | 6% |
| Psychology | 23 | 4% |
| Other | 91 | 15% |
| Unknown | 95 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2017.
All research outputs
#600,684
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Educational technology research and development
#12
of 1,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,184
of 273,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational technology research and development
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them