You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Translational biology of osteosarcoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Cancer, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nrc3838 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maya Kansara, Michele W. Teng, Mark J. Smyth, David M. Thomas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Comoros | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 503 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 486 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 93 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 68 | 14% |
| Researcher | 64 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 11% |
| Other | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 90 | 18% |
| Unknown | 101 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 113 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 103 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 87 | 17% |
| Engineering | 14 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 55 | 11% |
| Unknown | 118 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,300,106
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cancer
#446
of 2,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,138
of 272,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cancer
#8
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.