You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Age & Ageing, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ageing/afu145 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Denis O'Mahony, David O'Sullivan, Stephen Byrne, Marie Noelle O'Connor, Cristin Ryan, Paul Gallagher |
| Abstract |
screening tool of older people's prescriptions (STOPP) and screening tool to alert to right treatment (START) criteria were first published in 2008. Due to an expanding therapeutics evidence base, updating of the criteria was required. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 303 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 82 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 28 | 9% |
| Canada | 24 | 8% |
| United States | 8 | 3% |
| Japan | 6 | 2% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Ireland | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Unknown | 125 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 210 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 62 | 20% |
| Scientists | 23 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,752 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1739 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 294 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 165 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 148 | 8% |
| Researcher | 143 | 8% |
| Other | 139 | 8% |
| Other | 381 | 22% |
| Unknown | 482 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 596 | 34% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 355 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 93 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 1% |
| Other | 107 | 6% |
| Unknown | 547 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 352. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2023.
All research outputs
#93,647
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Age & Ageing
#24
of 3,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#782
of 268,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Age & Ageing
#1
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.