↓ Skip to main content

Hormones, Stress, and Cognition: The Effects of Glucocorticoids and Oxytocin on Memory

Overview of attention for article published in Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Hormones, Stress, and Cognition: The Effects of Glucocorticoids and Oxytocin on Memory
Published in
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40750-014-0010-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle M. Wirth

Abstract

Hormones have nuanced effects on learning and memory processes. The degree and direction of the effect (e.g., is memory impaired or enhanced?) depends on the dose, type and stage of memory, and type of material being learned, among other factors. This review will focus on two specific topics within the realm of effects of hormones on memory: (1) How glucocorticoids (the output hormones of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis) affect long-term memory consolidation, retrieval, and working memory, with a focus on neural mechanisms and effects of emotion; and (2) How oxytocin affects memory, with emphasis on a speculative hypothesis that oxytocin might exert its myriad effects on human social cognition and behavior via impacts on more general cognitive processes. Oxytocin-glucocorticoid interactions will be briefly addressed. These effects of hormones on memory will also be considered from an evolutionary perspective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 18%
Student > Master 20 14%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 39 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 14%
Neuroscience 18 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 45 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2016.
All research outputs
#5,828,064
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology
#95
of 176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,586
of 257,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.