↓ Skip to main content

Suicide of isolated inmates suffering from psychiatric disorders: when a preventive measure becomes punitive

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Legal Medicine, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Suicide of isolated inmates suffering from psychiatric disorders: when a preventive measure becomes punitive
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00414-017-1704-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Grassi, G. Mandarelli, M. Polacco, G. Vetrugno, A. G. Spagnolo, Fabio De-Giorgio

Abstract

We performed external autopsies and examinations on two inmates who had committed suicide by hanging themselves with their underwear and using the window bars of their cells as ligature points after they had been placed in solitary confinement. In one case, the inmate had even been deprived of her clothing (with the exception to her underwear). Underwear has been rarely described as a means for self-harm and, to the best of our knowledge, no previous study has focused on cases of prison suicides committed using this garment, even though it is available to every inmate. The two cases were very similar; both inmates were young, physically aggressive and in their first week at a new facility; both had been affected by mental disorders, had been prescribed psychotropic medications and had histories of psychiatric hospitalisation. In each case, the psychiatric evaluations had highlighted significant suicidal risk. We discuss these two cases in an attempt to describe the complexity of and contradictions within the management of suicidal inmates at correctional facilities. We aim to propose new strategies and emphasise the need to introduce evidence-based standardised protocols over inhumane, ineffective and simplistic punitive measures in the management of these individuals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 22%
Psychology 11 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,366,847
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#781
of 2,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,760
of 327,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#20
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,083 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.