↓ Skip to main content

Geographic distribution and incidence of Lyme borreliosis in the west of Ireland

Overview of attention for article published in Irish Journal of Medical Science, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geographic distribution and incidence of Lyme borreliosis in the west of Ireland
Published in
Irish Journal of Medical Science, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11845-017-1700-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Vellinga, H. Kilkelly, J. Cullinan, B. Hanahoe, M. Cormican

Abstract

Lyme borreliosis is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi and is the most common tick-transmitted infection in temperate regions. Infection often presents with erythema migrans and/or other clinical features in early infection. Blood samples are submitted for testing for antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi by enzyme immunoassay and positive samples are confirmed by a reference laboratory by IgG and IgM line immune assay. A retrospective extraction of all laboratory requests and results for Lyme borreliosis from 2011 to 2014 was performed. Patient addresses were mapped to local electoral area (LEA). The total number of requests was 5049 and 242 (5%) were positive over 5 years. The number of positive and tested samples were 40/748, 45/905, 41/947, 73/1126 and 43/1323 from 2011 to 2014. Even though the number of requests increased over the years, there was no significant increase in the number of positives. Incidences per 100,000 population for requests and positives were calculated at LEA level and showed considerable variation. The highest incidence was shown in one LEA (Connemara) with nearly 500 requests and 43 positives per 100,000 population per year. Increased awareness may explain the increase in requests. There is no indication of an increase in incidence. As many GPs treat suspected Lyme borreliosis empirically without testing and as antibody may be undetectable early in the course of illness, the true incidence of infection is likely to exceed the number of laboratory-confirmed cases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 23%
Researcher 4 18%
Other 3 14%
Librarian 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 23%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,970,125
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Irish Journal of Medical Science
#315
of 1,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,092
of 327,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Irish Journal of Medical Science
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.