You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ad hoc instrumentation methods in ecological studies produce highly biased temperature measurements
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology and Evolution, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ece3.3499 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam J. Terando, Elsa Youngsteadt, Emily K. Meineke, Sara G. Prado |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 47% |
| Norway | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 12 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 37% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 135 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 26% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 31 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,349,244
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecology and Evolution
#1,996
of 8,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,889
of 342,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology and Evolution
#57
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.