| Title |
The CLIVAR C20C project: skill of simulating Indian monsoon rainfall on interannual to decadal timescales. Does GHG forcing play a role?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climate Dynamics, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00382-008-0462-y |
| Authors |
F. Kucharski, A. A. Scaife, J. H. Yoo, C. K. Folland, J. Kinter, J. Knight, D. Fereday, A. M. Fischer, E. K. Jin, J. Kröger, N.-C. Lau, T. Nakaegawa, M. J. Nath, P. Pegion, E. Rozanov, S. Schubert, P. V. Sporyshev, J. Syktus, A. Voldoire, J. H. Yoon, N. Zeng, T. Zhou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 4 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 36% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 45 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2014.
All research outputs
#6,407,957
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#1,844
of 4,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,879
of 87,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.