| Title |
Including the public in pandemic planning: a deliberative approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-501 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annette J Braunack-Mayer, Jackie M Street, Wendy A Rogers, Rodney Givney, John R Moss, Janet E Hiller, Flu Views team |
| Abstract |
Against a background of pandemic threat posed by SARS and avian H5N1 influenza, this study used deliberative forums to elucidate informed community perspectives on aspects of pandemic planning. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
| Australia | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 151 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 21% |
| Researcher | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 43 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 15% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 53 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,722,734
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,562
of 17,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,669
of 108,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#17
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.