| Title |
Reuse options for coal fired power plant bottom ash and fly ash
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11157-014-9336-4 |
| Authors |
Madawala Liyanage Duminda Jayaranjan, Eric D. van Hullebusch, Ajit P. Annachhatre |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 339 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 14% |
| Researcher | 24 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 50 | 15% |
| Unknown | 94 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 116 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 21 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 13 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 48 | 14% |
| Unknown | 105 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,076,750
of 24,145,400 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
#33
of 269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,110
of 230,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,145,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 269 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them