↓ Skip to main content

Transanal versus abdominal low rectal dissection for rectal cancer: long-term results of the Bordeaux’ randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Transanal versus abdominal low rectal dissection for rectal cancer: long-term results of the Bordeaux’ randomized trial
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00464-017-5836-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quentin Denost, Paula Loughlin, Remy Chevalier, Bertrand Celerier, Romain Didailler, Eric Rullier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 17 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Unknown 20 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,754,515
of 25,603,577 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#498
of 6,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,664
of 338,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#17
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,603,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,920 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.