↓ Skip to main content

Scientific misconduct: a perspective from India

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Scientific misconduct: a perspective from India
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11019-014-9603-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Husain Sabir, Subhash Kumbhare, Amit Parate, Rajesh Kumar, Suroopa Das

Abstract

Misconduct in medical science research is an unfortunate reality. Science, for the most part, operates on the basis of trust. Researchers are expected to carry out their work and report their findings honestly. But, sadly, that is not how science always gets done. Reports keep surfacing from various countries about work being plagiarised, results which were doctored and data fabricated. Scientific misconduct is scourge afflicting the field of science, unfortunately with little impact in developing countries like India especially in health care services. A recent survey and a meta-analysis suggest that the few cases that do float up represents only tip of a large iceberg. This paper therefore highlights reasons for misconduct with steps that can be taken to reduce misconduct. Also the paper throws light on Indian scenario in relation to misconduct.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Master 6 14%
Other 5 12%
Librarian 4 9%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 12 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 16%
Arts and Humanities 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 13 30%