| Title |
Erratum to: Accounting for thermodynamic non-ideality in the Guinier region of small-angle scattering data of proteins
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biophysical Reviews, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12551-017-0328-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David J. Scott |
| Abstract |
The article "Accounting for thermodynamic non-ideality in the Guinier region of small-angle scattering data of protein", written by David J. Scott, was originally published without open access. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2017.
All research outputs
#19,762,064
of 24,286,850 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#544
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,717
of 332,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#22
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,286,850 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.