↓ Skip to main content

Taste receptors in innate immunity

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 5,887)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
Taste receptors in innate immunity
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00018-014-1736-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert J. Lee, Noam A. Cohen

Abstract

Taste receptors were first identified on the tongue, where they initiate a signaling pathway that communicates information to the brain about the nutrient content or potential toxicity of ingested foods. However, recent research has shown that taste receptors are also expressed in a myriad of other tissues, from the airway and gastrointestinal epithelia to the pancreas and brain. The functions of many of these extraoral taste receptors remain unknown, but emerging evidence suggests that bitter and sweet taste receptors in the airway are important sentinels of innate immunity. This review discusses taste receptor signaling, focusing on the G-protein-coupled receptors that detect bitter, sweet, and savory tastes, followed by an overview of extraoral taste receptors and in-depth discussion of studies demonstrating the roles of taste receptors in airway innate immunity. Future research on extraoral taste receptors has significant potential for identification of novel immune mechanisms and insights into host-pathogen interactions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 161 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 18%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 36 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 6%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 40 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#676,116
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#49
of 5,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,126
of 271,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#2
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.