↓ Skip to main content

A survey of the attitudes of practitioners toward teleaudiology

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Audiology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A survey of the attitudes of practitioners toward teleaudiology
Published in
International Journal of Audiology, July 2014
DOI 10.3109/14992027.2014.921736
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gurjit Singh, M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller, Marissa Malkowski, Michael Boretzki, Stefan Launer

Abstract

Objective: To survey hearing healthcare practitioners' (1) attitudes toward teleaudiology appointments, (2) willingness to conduct different clinical tasks via teleaudiology, and (3) willingness to conduct a teleaudiology appointment with different patient populations. Design: All participants were asked to complete the Attitudes toward Teleaudiology Scale for Practitioners (ATS-P), a 46-item online survey designed for this study. Study sample: The responses from 202 hearing healthcare practitioners working in Canada were collected. The sample consisted of 152 audiologists, 49 hearing instrument specialists, and one who did not specify a category. Results: The majority of respondents indicated that teleaudiology is likely to have a minimal effect on the quality of hearing healthcare in audiology and the quality of client-practitioner interactions, although many respondents indicated that teleaudiology would have a positive effect on accessibility to service. Nevertheless, a small minority of respondents indicated that teleaudiology would have a negative impact on quality of care in audiology. Conclusions: Willingness to use teleaudiology depended on a combination of the clinical tasks to be performed and the patient populations to be served. These findings can help guide the successful implementation of teleaudiology services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 136 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 19%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 5 4%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 44 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 29 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 51 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Audiology
#1,191
of 1,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,921
of 241,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Audiology
#13
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.