↓ Skip to main content

MTHFR, MTR, and MTRR Polymorphisms in Relation to p16INK4A Hypermethylation in Mucosa of Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Medicine, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
MTHFR, MTR, and MTRR Polymorphisms in Relation to p16INK4A Hypermethylation in Mucosa of Patients with Colorectal Cancer
Published in
Molecular Medicine, June 2010
DOI 10.2119/molmed.2009.00156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne Wettergren, Elisabeth Odin, Göran Carlsson, Bengt Gustavsson

Abstract

We recently analyzed the hypermethylation status of the p16INK4a (p16) gene promoter in normal-appearing mucosa obtained from patients with colorectal cancer. Hypermethylation of p16 was associated with reduced survival of these patients. In the present study, germ line polymorphisms in the folate- and methyl-associated genes, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), methionine synthase (MTR) and methionine synthase reductase (MTRR), were analyzed in the same patient cohort to find a possible link between these genetic variants and p16 hypermethylation. Genomic DNA was extracted from blood of patients (n = 181) and controls (n = 300). Genotype analyses were run on an ABI PRISM(®) 7900HT sequence-detection system (Applied Biosystems), using real-time polymerase chain reaction and TaqMan chemistry. The results showed that the genotype distributions of the patient and control groups were similar. No significant differences in cancer-specific or disease-free survival of stage I-III patients according to polymorphic variants were detected, nor were any differences in cancer-specific or disease-free survival detected when patients were subgrouped according to the MTHFR or MTR genotype groups and dichotomized by p16 hypermethylation status in mucosa. However, patients with the MTRR 66 AA/AG genotypes were found to have a significantly worse cancer-specific survival when the mucosa were positive, compared with negative, for p16 hypermethylation (hazard ratio 2.7; 95% confidence interval 1.2-6.4; P = 0.023). In contrast, there was no difference in survival among patients with the MTRR 66 GG genotype stratified by p16 hypermethylation status. These results indicate a relationship between genetic germ-line variants of the MTRR gene and p16 hypermethylation in mucosa, which may affect the clinical outcome of patients with colorectal cancer.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 9%
Denmark 1 5%
Unknown 19 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 18%
Researcher 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 6 27%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 27%
Unspecified 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,541,115
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Medicine
#368
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,334
of 96,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Medicine
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.