Title |
Polar night ecology of a pelagic predator, the chaetognath Parasagitta elegans
|
---|---|
Published in |
Polar Biology, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00300-014-1577-8 |
Authors |
Jordan J. Grigor, Ariane E. Marais, Stig Falk-Petersen, Øystein Varpe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 21% |
Researcher | 8 | 17% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 32% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 9% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2014.
All research outputs
#18,380,628
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#1,348
of 1,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,627
of 255,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#31
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.