↓ Skip to main content

Diabetes Mellitus and the Colon

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 292)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Diabetes Mellitus and the Colon
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11938-017-0151-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc S. Piper, Richard J. Saad

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (DM) can affect the structure and function of the colon promoting commonly encountered lower gastrointestinal symptoms such as constipation, diarrhea, abdominal distention, bloating, and abdominal pain. Specific colonic disorders for which adults with DM are at greater risk include chronic constipation, enteropathic diarrhea, colorectal cancer (CRC), inflammatory bowel disease, microscopic colitis, and Clostridium difficile colitis. Smooth muscle structure and function, density of the interstitial cells of Cajal, and the health and function of the autonomic and enteric nerves of the colon are all potential affected by DM. These effects can in turn lead to alterations in colon motility, visceral sensation, immune function, endothelial function, and the colonic microbiome. The evaluation and treatment for slow transit constipation as well as pelvic floor dysfunction should be considered when constipation symptoms are refractory to initial treatment measures. DM-related medications and small bowel conditions such as celiac disease and small intestinal bowel overgrowth should be considered and excluded before a diagnosis of enteropathic diarrhea is made. Given the higher risk of CRC, adults with DM should be appropriately screened and may require a longer bowel preparation to ensure an adequate evaluation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 39 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 44 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,451,885
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology
#9
of 292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,200
of 338,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them