| Title |
Do Individual Differences Predict Change in Cognitive Training Performance? A Latent Growth Curve Modeling Approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s41465-017-0049-9 |
| Authors |
Sabrina Guye, Carla De Simoni, Claudia C. von Bastian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 22% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
| Scientists | 9 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 39 | 46% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,620,815
of 25,196,456 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
#42
of 211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,087
of 334,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,196,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.