↓ Skip to main content

Mapping unmet supportive care needs, quality-of-life perceptions and current symptoms in cancer survivors across the Asia-Pacific region: results from the International STEP Study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Oncology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mapping unmet supportive care needs, quality-of-life perceptions and current symptoms in cancer survivors across the Asia-Pacific region: results from the International STEP Study
Published in
Annals of Oncology, October 2017
DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdx350
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Molassiotis, P. Yates, Q. Li, W.K.W. So, K. Pongthavornkamol, P. Pittayapan, H. Komatsu, M. Thandar, M. Yi, S. Titus Chacko, V. Lopez, J. Butcon, D. Wyld, R.J. Chan, the STEP Study Collaborators, Melissa Doolan, Maria Estrella Litam, Rubiliza Onofre, Conchitina Lluch, Rosebe Nacion, Maria Luisa Ombao, Zaw Wai Soe, Theingi Myint, Emily Ang, Harue Arao, Kaori Yagasaki, Vinitha Ravindran, Roselin V. Rhenius, Amalorpavamari Lucas, Lillian Percy Kujur, Abijah Princy, Kai-chow Choi, Yin-ping Choy, Yan-pui Lee, Chun-yip Shiu, Yinghua Xu

Abstract

To assess the supportive care needs, quality of life (QoL) and symptoms of patients with cancer after the end of first-line treatments and into survivorship in Asian countries using Australian data as benchmark. A cross-sectional survey was carried out in Australia and eight high-income (HICs) and low-/middle-income (LMICs) Asian countries (China, Japan, Hong Kong SAR, South Korea, Myanmar, Thailand, India, Philippines) using validated scales (Cancer Survivors Unmet Needs scale), physical-symptom concerns (Cancer Survivors Survey of Needs subscale) and a single-item measure of global QoL perception. Data were collected from 1748 patients from nine countries. QoL was highest in Australia and all other countries had significantly lower QoL than Australia (all P < 0.001). One-quarter of the patients reported low QoL (scores 1-3/10). The most frequently reported symptoms were fatigue (66.6%), loss of strength (61.8%), pain (61.6%), sleep disturbance (60.1%), and weight changes (57.7%), with no difference in symptom experience between Australian data and all other countries, or between HICs and LMICs. Unmet needs of moderate/strong level were particularly high in all aspects assessed, particularly in the area of existential survivorship (psychosocial care) and receiving comprehensive cancer care. Australia and HICs were similar in terms of unmet needs (all low), but LMICs had a significantly higher number of needs both compared with Australia and HICs (all P < 0.001). Health care systems in Asian countries need to re-think and prioritize survivorship cancer care and put action plans in place to overcome some of the challenges surrounding the delivery of optimal supportive cancer care, use available resource-stratified guidelines for supportive care and test efficient and cost-effective models of survivorship care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 170 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 15%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 56 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 40 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 22%
Psychology 9 5%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 62 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,797,626
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Oncology
#2,074
of 7,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,837
of 331,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Oncology
#62
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.