↓ Skip to main content

Esophageal Cancer Management: Preoperative CA19.9 and CEA Serum Levels May Identify Occult Advanced Adenocarcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Esophageal Cancer Management: Preoperative CA19.9 and CEA Serum Levels May Identify Occult Advanced Adenocarcinoma
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00268-014-2835-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Scarpa, Giulia Noaro, Luca Saadeh, Francesco Cavallin, Matteo Cagol, Rita Alfieri, Mario Plebani, Carlo Castoro

Abstract

Esophagectomy is contraindicated in case of advanced cancer (i.e., carcinomatosis, distant metastasis, and invasion of other organs). In some cases, preoperative imaging may fail to identify advanced neoplasm and esophagectomy is inappropriately planned. The aim of the study was to identify preoperative biomarkers of occult advanced disease that force surgeons to abort the planned esophagectomy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 22%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 56%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2015.
All research outputs
#6,358,755
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,206
of 4,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,759
of 258,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#16
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.