↓ Skip to main content

New approaches to selectively target cancer-associated matrix metalloproteinase activity

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
New approaches to selectively target cancer-associated matrix metalloproteinase activity
Published in
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10555-014-9530-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marilena Tauro, Jeremy McGuire, Conor C. Lynch

Abstract

Heightened matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity has been noted in the context of the tumor microenvironment for many years, and causal roles for MMPs have been defined across the spectrum of cancer progression. This is primarily due to the ability of the MMPs to process extracellular matrix (ECM) components and to regulate the bioavailability/activity of a large repertoire of cytokines and growth factors. These characteristics made MMPs an attractive target for therapeutic intervention but notably clinical trials performed in the 1990s did not fulfill the promise of preclinical studies. The reason for the failure of early MMP inhibitor (MMPI) clinical trials that are multifold but arguably principal among them was the inability of early MMP-based inhibitors to selectively target individual MMPs and to distinguish between MMPs and other members of the metzincin family. In the decades that have followed the MMP inhibitor trials, innovations in chemical design, antibody-based strategies, and nanotechnologies have greatly enhanced our ability to specifically target and measure the activity of MMPs. These advances provide us with the opportunity to generate new lines of highly selective MMPIs that will not only extend the overall survival of cancer patients, but will also afford us the ability to utilize heightened MMP activity in the tumor microenvironment as a means by which to deliver MMPIs or MMP activatable prodrugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 23%
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 14%
Chemistry 7 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,416,177
of 24,413,320 outputs
Outputs from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#275
of 849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,637
of 263,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,413,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.