| Title |
The impact of music therapy versus music medicine on psychological outcomes and pain in cancer patients: a mixed methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-014-2478-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joke Bradt, Noah Potvin, Amy Kesslick, Minjung Shim, Donna Radl, Emily Schriver, Edward J. Gracely, Lydia T. Komarnicky-Kocher |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of music therapy (MT) versus music medicine (MM) interventions on psychological outcomes and pain in cancer patients and to enhance understanding of patients' experiences of these two types of music interventions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 69% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 447 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 439 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 75 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 11% |
| Researcher | 30 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 7% |
| Other | 74 | 17% |
| Unknown | 123 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 79 | 18% |
| Psychology | 75 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 30 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 4% |
| Other | 52 | 12% |
| Unknown | 137 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,734,557
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#210
of 5,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,341
of 275,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#3
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.