↓ Skip to main content

Histopathological Findings in Brain Tissue Obtained during Epilepsy Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
622 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
580 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Histopathological Findings in Brain Tissue Obtained during Epilepsy Surgery
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, October 2017
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1703784
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingmar Blumcke, Roberto Spreafico, Gerrit Haaker, Roland Coras, Katja Kobow, Christian G Bien, Margarete Pfäfflin, Christian Elger, Guido Widman, Johannes Schramm, Albert Becker, Kees P Braun, Frans Leijten, Johannes C Baayen, Eleonora Aronica, Francine Chassoux, Hajo Hamer, Hermann Stefan, Karl Rössler, Maria Thom, Matthew C Walker, Sanjay M Sisodiya, John S Duncan, Andrew W McEvoy, Tom Pieper, Hans Holthausen, Manfred Kudernatsch, H Joachim Meencke, Philippe Kahane, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage, Josef Zentner, Dieter H Heiland, Horst Urbach, Bernhard J Steinhoff, Thomas Bast, Laura Tassi, Giorgio Lo Russo, Cigdem Özkara, Buge Oz, Pavel Krsek, Silke Vogelgesang, Uwe Runge, Holger Lerche, Yvonne Weber, Mrinalini Honavar, José Pimentel, Alexis Arzimanoglou, Adriana Ulate-Campos, Soheyl Noachtar, Elisabeth Hartl, Olaf Schijns, Renzo Guerrini, Carmen Barba, Thomas S Jacques, J Helen Cross, Martha Feucht, Angelika Mühlebner, Thomas Grunwald, Eugen Trinka, Peter A Winkler, Antonio Gil-Nagel, Rafael Toledano Delgado, Thomas Mayer, Martin Lutz, Basilios Zountsas, Kyriakos Garganis, Felix Rosenow, Anke Hermsen, Tim J von Oertzen, Thomas L Diepgen, Giuliano Avanzini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 121 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 580 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 580 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 86 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 12%
Other 54 9%
Student > Master 46 8%
Student > Bachelor 46 8%
Other 128 22%
Unknown 151 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 175 30%
Neuroscience 103 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 2%
Other 60 10%
Unknown 200 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#370,188
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#5,582
of 32,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,749
of 342,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#122
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.